Data from April 2011 Editor Survey that lists Social Media activities (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
There is a fantastic post on Media Bistro’s blog, 10,000 WORDS by Meranda Watling. ”Infographic: How Social Media Wins AtBreaking News” speaks volumes of how news consumers get their breaking news and how much that has changed over the last decade.
Watling opens up by asking her readers to try and recall how they learned of the attack on Sept. 11. She sums up by acknowledging that most people found out through television, contacted their relatives by phone, if possible, and then likely read the newspapers the next day and followed up with a weekly news magazine. She points out, we didn’t hear of it through social media, likeFacebook or Twitter because they weren’t invented at the time.
Watling continues to discuss how major news stories spread through social media, using thekilling of Osama Bin Laden and other stories as examples. Her article discusses the very real change that is taking place in the news industry with respect to the advancement of social media becoming one of the major sources of news for people.
Watling concludes her article with a graphic done by Schools.com, that referenced a Pew Research Center study titled, “What Facebook and Twitter Mean For News.“
I don’t think it comes as major surprise to those who already use social networking on regular basis. The implications however, of social networks becoming a serious player in the news industry is something to consider carefully. Especially, in an age of citizen journalism, when blogging and other forms of news dissemination is exploding on the frontlines of journalism.
Before you get too excited and think you can now depend on getting all of your information from sites like Facebook and Twitter, note in the graph where it states that 49.1% of people have at some point heard breaking news on social media that turned out to be false.
Ah, the new-age, old problem of citizen journalism. Verification. It’s wise to not believe everything you see or hear on these sites, but with a little digging, you can pretty quickly decipher the validity of the breaking news. Watling touches on the issue of trust and verification of reporting in her blog post, but leaves it for another day.
On the School.com website that displays this graphic, I don’t know that I would go so far as to agree with the notion that social media is replacing journalism. I don’t think that’s the case. I do think, the news industry is figuring out how to capitalize on social media sites, and while anyone can become a news producer these days, not everyone follows the guidelines and “rules” of traditional journalism. So, social media is not quite there yet. Could it be ten or twenty years from now? I think that is a very real possibility.
The graphic below is the one produced by Schools.com.
(courtesy: WATCHING THE WATCHDOG & kendra75)